National Consumer Law Center Statement Regarding CFPB Mortgage Servicing Rules

The Following is the statement released by the National Consumer Law Center in response to the CFPB’s new servicer rules.
WASHINGTON─ “We commend the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau for seeking to address broad problems in the mortgage servicing industry and for extending some sensible, enforceable, guidelines to the entire market,” said National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) attorney Alys Cohen. “However, the CFPB’s final rules fail to implement the key lesson of the foreclosure crisis, that a loan modification requirement is essential to protect qualified homeowners from unnecessary foreclosures. While the establishment of industry-wide standards is important, the failure to require meaningful loan modification protections is a retreat from current safeguards under the soon-to-expire HAMP loan modification program.”

Earlier this week, NCLC published At a Crossroads: Lessons from the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), which details key principles for national loan modification standards. Measured against those principles, the CFPB’s rules fail to ensure access to sustainable loan modifications for all qualified homeowners. Investors and homeowners stand to lose from the lack of a loan modification mandate. The CFPB’s new rules partially address the persistent “dual-tracking” problem, the simultaneous processing of a foreclosure and a loan modification. According to Cohen, “the CFPB rules require servicers who choose to do loan modifications to finish a review before starting a foreclosure. These provisions will help homeowners who respond to initial outreach by mortgage servicers. The rules also restrict a servicer from moving for a foreclosure judgment or order of sale, or from conducting a foreclosure sale, where the borrower submits a complete application for a loss mitigation option after the foreclosure process has commenced but more than 37 days before a foreclosure sale. While providing some additional protections to borrowers in judicial foreclosure states, this requirement provides significantly less protection to homeowners facing non-judicial foreclosure procedures. Moreover, because many homeowners will not know the sale date until after the 37-day mark, and will generally face difficulties knowing when the 37th day falls (because many sales are scheduled with less than 37 days’ advance notice), the rules give servicers an opportunity to manipulate the system. All homeowners need protection during the foreclosure process, with rules that recognize the real timelines they face. The rules also appear to deny homeowners an appeal of a loan modification review where that application has not been submitted 90 days prior to the sale. Every homeowner deserves a fair hearing and the rule does not provide for that.”

The CFPB’s new rules also implement the error resolution provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. “We appreciate the CFPB incorporating a provision in the error resolution requirement so that homeowners have an opportunity to address all servicer errors, not just a select list,” said Cohen.

The federal banking agencies are currently drafting a guidance document on mortgage servicing, which, along with the Bureau’s own rulemaking process offers an opportunity to address the shortcomings in the CFPB’s rules. “We hope the agencies and the CFPB will take steps to completely end dual tracking, and to ensure that qualified homeowners have enforceable access to affordable loan modifications where the modification also provides a benefit to investors over foreclosure,” said Cohen. “Servicers must not be permitted to continue wrongful foreclosures.”

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Author’s Note: To learn more about how bankruptcy can help with consumer mortgage issues check out our Bankruptcy FAQ.  For more information regarding loan modifications subscribe for our free ebook 10 Secrets To Successful Loan Modification.

About the Author
Rhinold Ponder is the managing partner at Ponder Tuck Ponder, an aggressive firm which emphasizes litigation in consumer issuers and bankruptcy protection for debtors. Rhinold is also an accomplished artist and speaker on issues of consumer rights. He also operated The DIY Lawyer blog which focuses on redistributing justice and democracy by empowering through information sharing and education.

Leave a Reply

*

captcha *